<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fine (and Fee) Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yestoknow.com/2007/08/14/fine-and-fee-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yestoknow.com/2007/08/14/fine-and-fee-service/</link>
	<description>Libraries, Learning, Life--how they converge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://yestoknow.com/2007/08/14/fine-and-fee-service/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yestoknow.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/fine-and-fee-service/#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did I read the article correctly - did an adult patron actually present as an excuse for racking up overdue fines the lack of an obviously-placed reminder slip?  And then did this same rule-breaking adult patron blame her daughter&#039;s lack of library use on a policy designed to encourage people to pay money that they legitimately owe?  I understand that libraries are a free service to the public (as free as any other tax-based community amenity).  I also get that libraries want to encourage patrons of all ages to come in, sit down, check it out and read.  But patrons need to understand that using the public library is a relationship just like all others - it requires two responsible, responsive parties in order to work.  In my opinion, overdue fines are a small price to pay for what is a pretty amazing public amenity.  Can&#039;t get your books back on time?  Can&#039;t afford the $25 fine because you aren&#039;t responsible enough to bring back your book for 170 days?  I say you deserve jail time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I read the article correctly &#8211; did an adult patron actually present as an excuse for racking up overdue fines the lack of an obviously-placed reminder slip?  And then did this same rule-breaking adult patron blame her daughter&#8217;s lack of library use on a policy designed to encourage people to pay money that they legitimately owe?  I understand that libraries are a free service to the public (as free as any other tax-based community amenity).  I also get that libraries want to encourage patrons of all ages to come in, sit down, check it out and read.  But patrons need to understand that using the public library is a relationship just like all others &#8211; it requires two responsible, responsive parties in order to work.  In my opinion, overdue fines are a small price to pay for what is a pretty amazing public amenity.  Can&#8217;t get your books back on time?  Can&#8217;t afford the $25 fine because you aren&#8217;t responsible enough to bring back your book for 170 days?  I say you deserve jail time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

